Hanky Panky Silky Skin Hi-Rise Panty 8641 Reviews

This style has nice coverage with no pantylines and can look complimentary on most Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: September, 2019

Feels great and looks wonderful. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Posted: April, 2016

So comfortable, no lines, no muffin top! Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2016

These are the most comfortable and yet beautiful panty I have seen in a long time. Jo Lynn from Artesia, NM , USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60s
• Posted: May, 2015

Pretty, soft and feel great! JoyC from USA

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 40s
• Posted: May, 2015

Love these. They look beautiful and sexy while giving me a lot of coverage. The best-looking "Granny Panty!" Cassandra from Dallas

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: April, 2015

Super comfortable and sexy! Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2015

soft and comfortable Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2014

Pretty waistband, the fabric is absolutely divine. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2014

Crazy expensive, but I keep buying them because they make my old, droopy bottom look good, and I feel pretty with all that lace. Jacqueline from Dallas

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40s
• Posted: February, 2014

Can't see it through my clothing Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2013

Used after surgeries!!!! GREAT!!!!! Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2013

feel sexy but more comfortable for me than thong Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2013

These are a very attractive high-rise panty, with lots of lace between the hip and low waist. But the overall feel of the fabric is somewhat loose so this isn't a panty that will hold your stuff, if you know what I mean. There just isn't any shaping whatsoever...back they go. Very nice for the right body. Limited colors. Caveat Emptor from Los Angeles, CA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: November, 2012

worth every penny...... kay

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 60s
• Posted: October, 2012

Great fit...comfortable, no show lines. A bit pricey, but worth it! Donna from TN/USA

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: October, 2012

Lovely and soft. chell from Calgary

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: June, 2012

I read all the reviews on these panties, and based on prior comments that they run large, I ordered accordingly. But, upon receiving them, there is no way these warrant a price tag of $38! They are plain old polyester!The lace top is so slack, it just doesn't hug enough not to roll down! If I hadn't tried and washed them, I would have returned for a refund.

Hanky Panky Response: We’re so sorry that the Silky Skin Hi-Rise brief didn’t work for you. It does run large, and is best suited for those with fuller hips. However, we are a little confused by your assertion that they are made of polyester. The body fabric is an exclusive microfiber filament rayon-spandex jersey (which comes from cellulose, and breathes almost like cotton). The gusset is 100% cotton, and the lace hip band is a nylon-spandex stretch lace. JC from Estero FL

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: May, 2012

Silky feel and supportive comfort. Minimized pantylines. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2012

I love these panties. For a lacy style these are incredibly well made and wash perfectly. Provides coverage without looking frumpy, and very very comfortable. They are worth the price. Roberta from San Francisco CA, USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60s
• Posted: December, 2011

Comfy, pretty, and no VPL. A nice gift to give yourself, or to ask someone to buy for you. Yes, it's expensive, but I still bought 2. JT from Boston

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: August, 2011

I always get these panties. They cover and look great for a full panty. Susan from NYC US

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: July, 2011

When I opened the package and held these up I was surprised at how large they were. They looked more like extra-large than medium. Also didn't like the bumpy feel of the lace.

Hanky Panky Response: You are correct this style does run a bit big. It is a full coverage panty as Tomima's Tip states. if you are between sizes I would suggest you size down. BizProf

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 30s
• Posted: July, 2011

Love the lace and fit Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Posted: June, 2011

They are too large for me -- I think the ad should state that they run large.

Hanky Panky Response: Hanky Panky's full-coverage panties do tend to run a bit large across the board. Lisa from Palo Alto,CA usa

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 70s
• Posted: May, 2011

As compared to Hanky Panky's retro v-kini in the same size, I found that these undies seemed a bit on the baggy side in the rear end and so I returned them to exchange for the v-kini.

Hanky Panky Response: You are correct. These two cuts do fit differently. The retro lace V-kini is made with a lace which has a high spandex content, enabling the panty to have a firmer, snugger fit. It also has a V- shape design, which gives it a closer contour. The silky skin high rise is made of a softer lace and light, silky jersey with a lower spandex content in a different silhouette. Different designs offer solutions for varying body types. Thank you so much for trying these panties, and we hope that you will continue to be very happy with the retro-v-kinis. desertsong from tucson, az

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: May, 2011

Very pretty panties! Love the lace look. Fit the curves beautifully and are a nice alternative to bikinis. Mary from Fairfax/VA/USA

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: April, 2011

Great panties! Wish they were a little less expensive. Recommend hand-washing or delicate cycle so that lace stays intact. I will get another pair, but have to save up! :) herroomfan from massachusetts

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40s
• Posted: April, 2011

Surprisingly comfortable for such frilly-looking panties. I got only one pair, but may order more in other colors. Elizabeth from California

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 60s
• Posted: March, 2011

These are the perfect panties for the mature woman to wear in order to feel good about herself!! No "Granny panties" for me!! Each style I have chosen so far is great. Alice from Surfside Beach, SC, USA

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: March, 2011

These panties are worth every penny. They are attractive, comfortable and flattering to older women. Alice from SC

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: February, 2011

I like these very much. Areta from [Kaufman

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 70s
• Posted: December, 2010

Very comfortable and flattering. Feel sexy in them. NYNYGiraffe from New York, NY USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: October, 2010

Perfect fit. Very comfortable. They make me feel sexy. Bought several pairs. NYNYGiraffe from New York, NY USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: October, 2010

I must be the pickiest person alive about my panties and these are the best I have ever worn! Worth every penny. Bring us more colors. CD from Atlanta, GA USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: October, 2010

I am large in the areas covered by these panties but they fit and look great! Oceana from Pacific Grove, CA, USA

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Age: 70s
• Posted: September, 2010

The fit is good and quite comfortable. It is a pretty panty and the fabric, lace and construction are quality. Overall, I like it a lot. The one thing that is making me nuts about it is that the cotton crotch is about an inch too short in the front so that the fabric absorbs any moisture that might be there and it leaves a mark. It washes beautifully but in the mean time I don't feel like I can wander around in my panties and t's because it looks like I had a problem, even if I didn't. Make the panel a bit longer to cover all the necessary spots and we have a winner! jan from nj

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: September, 2010

I love this panty and I would order more! Tina from California

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: August, 2010

I love them raquel from san antonio/texas/78230

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60s
• Posted: August, 2010

Comfortable,pretty! judy from jacksonville

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60s
• Posted: August, 2010

I like these panties as they are comfortable, pretty and cover some of the tummy in a 1940s pin up kind of way. I am now favoring this look after babies - my stomach is not as flat and taut as it used to be and this high waisted style looks very cute and stylish with a pretty bra. I have these in both black and nude. For us rounder ladies, they cover your assets quite nicely and have enabled me to stop wearing thongs ( which I hate- even the comfier Hanky Panky ones) because they don't show a panty line across your cheeks- there might be a slight line around the edges of your bottom but it's pretty subtle. I wish they weren't so pricey AND came in fun colors like the rest of the Hanky Panky line! Juliet from East Dummerston, VT

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40s
• Posted: June, 2010

This fabric just glides over my skin...the lace waistband is gorgeous!!!!! Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Posted: April, 2010

No vpl, soft, comfortable, no ride up. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2010

Very soft and flattering. Only complaint - these panties need a matching bra available on this site. These are too pretty to wear with a mismatched bra.

HerRoom Response: Thank you for your feedback. There is no matching bra, but there are two matching chemises in the Hanky Panky Silky Skin Collection. LingerieFan from New Jersey

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Age: 40s
• Posted: March, 2010

I really like the look and feel of these undies. The lace is extremely smooth and comfortable. They moved around a lot and I had to keep adjusting them, so I may try a smaller size. Nicole

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 30s
• Posted: January, 2010

Yes, these panties are EXPENSIVE! But, they are comfortable and look great on. I was frankly surprised how comfortable and pretty they looked on. I'm going to buy more, but wish they were cheaper. Jacqueline from Seattle

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: September, 2009

Sexy and super soft and comfortable. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: March, 2009

nice fit.looks good too ronnie from freeport ny usa

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Age: 60s
• Posted: November, 2008

They were nice. I like them because they look nice, yet offer support. Susan from Tampa, FL

• Posted: August, 2007