Calida Comfort Stretch Cotton Short Leg Panties 25024

Very pleased, the cotton is what I needed and they have just the right amount of stretch, nice & comfortable. I ordered the longer leg also, waiting for those to arrive, & I'm sure I will be just as pleased. Patty from Corpus Christti, TX

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 70s
• Posted: August 22,2017

What a great experience to find undies that are torture-free. i don't miss the elastic rubbing the groin areas one bit. Mildred from St. Petersburg, Fl.

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 70s
• Posted: May 22,2017

Excellent in every way! Got tired of the low rise boy shorts had me hiking up my undies constantly. These just so comfortably glide over your skin and stay in place. Cant find these style in cotton except in European brands. No riding up of the leg but the long leg style is a bit too "bulky" for me. The boy short style eliminates panty line and find cotton ones like these are much more comfortable AJ from Hartford CT USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: November 27,2016

I am fond of Calida products. These are very soft and well made. Like many Calida products, they run large, so I order down one size. This leg length can be awkward if they are loose, and bunch up, so you don't want them fitting loose. Many panties chafe me around the top of the leg. Because of the longer leg openings, these are great on days when I want a break from the usual leg openings because of rashes or tenderness. They're also becoming in a retro kind of way. I wish these came in more colors. Emmy from Lexington, NY

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60s
• Posted: April 4,2016

The pants are lovely--came beautifully packaged. When I put them on they appear to fit fine. The trouble begins when I'm going about my daily activities. The inner thighs creep up which is annoying. Perhaps I am a large in this brand. (I'm size 14 and I ordered a medium per the Calida recommendation).

Calida Response: We suggest trying style 26024. This as a longer leg, which might help with legs moving up on you. Jean Ann from 45042

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: March 9,2016

Gave up thongs, switched to these, could not be more comfortable! Sooooo happy! Getting ready to order 7 pairs. Thank you! J9 from RVA/USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: February 22,2016

On me (with thighs that barely rub together), these are perhaps 1-2" shorter than they look in the picture, and the bottom of the leg feels slightly loose and flappy in the back. The cotton is very comfortable, and the elastic at the top is great for a 40" waist. They're fine under a loose skirt. Lisa from Berkeley, CA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: November 4,2015

I am tallish (5'10") and slender in a thickening-with-age sort of way (around the middle, that is). I thought these "boy shorts" might be best for younger women, but they are simply perfect and wonderfully comfortable. No panty line, no waist and leg constrictions, Lines do not show under fitness clothes. As I am heading into my later years I will spend those years in fine, well made cotton undies. Jean from Maine

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Age: 60s
• Posted: August 19,2015

Nice garment, with elastic at top, at waist, and on bottom of thighs. I prefer the Jockey for Her Skimmies type, which has all the same fabric, only it offers a bit more overall cling to the skin and never rides up. Also, Jockey costs less. These are worth it to try and see if you like them. Lisa from Cape Cod, MA

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 60s
• Posted: July 9,2015

Unfortunately, they were not comfortable because the legs on the shorts didn't stay down and cut into me. Mena from Claremont, CA

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: June 30,2015

I love this product- it is worth its price - STAR from Brownsville Texas

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50s
• Posted: May 11,2015

I wavered between ordering XL or L. After chatting with "live chat" and reading all the reviews, I decided to go with XL and L. The XL are a bit large for me [hips 49] and tend to ride up between thighs. Herroom replies to comments indicated that if the legs "ride up" then the size is too large. The L are a perfect fit, shall keep them for wearing under dresses, leggings, to PT under yoga pants, under EVERYTHING. LOVE the fabric! So soft, not totally opaque, and the leg hem is not as tight or unforgiving as I had imagined. Definitely worth the money!! pencilfox from Alaska

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50s
• Posted: April 27,2015