I have been looking for panties similar to these. (not these) but they are "similar". A review said to order big so I did and that was a mistake. So I had to re-order. Just in case, I also ordered 3 pair an EXTRA size smaller... bad idea. The first ones were WAY too big. As with Goldilocks, the "middle size order" was just right. So the smaller size was TOO small! I love the material though, soft, very lightweight. The butt seam I'm not too happy about, it leads to my outer garments creeping into places you don't want things creeping into, but all in all, I am pretty happy with the merchandise, they are the closest ones I have found to what I have been looking for for about 10 years. Linda from Long Beach, CA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "No Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: April, 2013

These are suppose to be microfiber. They are not soft at all. They are the cheapest made panties that I ever bought.

Teri Response: We are sorry to hear you are not satisfied. These panties are made from elegant and stretchy super soft microfiber indeed. They are made from a single piece of fabric and have only one seam in the back so there are no seams binding on the sides. Tina from San Antonio

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: January, 2013

I really love these panties and would like to order more. The legs size was a little tight so you might want to order the next size up. But I really enjoy these! Debbie from Haverhill, Ma.

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: January, 2013

Love these panties. Comfortable and looks great. I will be buying more. B from Lancaster, S C Usa

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over), "No Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: October, 2012

Wonderful fit! Bobbie from Lancaster, S C Usa

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: September, 2012

Very smooth and stretchy. I originally tried the size 16 which had a great fit, with lots of stretch, so I also tried these 15's which also fit great with lots of stretch. If you want comfort I don't think you can go wrong. customer

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: August, 2012

There is not enough elastic in the waist band. Barb

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: June, 2012

very comfortable and fit well. I wash these on delicate and do NOT dry in the dryer. my only problem was trying to figure out the right size to order and I was lucky and made the right choice. Every store's sizes vary in one way or another. I would recommend these to all! Debbie from Crawfordsville

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60's
• Posted: June, 2012

Although the panty is very nice, the leg and waist openings are too tight for the size. To get a proper fit, you need to order up a size. If not for that, I would have given a 5-star rating. Monica from Luling, LA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: May, 2012

Again, shaped for an upside down egg...way too big at the waist. I did love the fabric, and will try to alter the one pair I'm keeping...sending the other two back.

HerRoom Response: Linda, you left a complaint on 3 different Teri styles. This brand may simply not be for you.

Teri Response: We are sorry to hear that you were not pleased with our product. This panty should stretch to fit everyone. A complaint like this is very unusual, because It’s a very stretchy and in a very soft microfiber. Linda from TACOMA

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: January, 2012

Fit well, great feeling,support is awesome. Will by more. willburr from madison wisconsin

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: December, 2011

Fell very nice and fits better than I expected I usually ware bikini or thong but like to wear full brief for comfort once a week. diane from los angeles

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: June, 2011