FREE Standard USA SHIPPING with $70 Order*
Close

Commando Girl Short Low-Rise Panty gs Reviews

Girl Short Low-Rise Panty
ratingImage
Overall Review Rating (38)
Write a review
                                            Filter By:   Star Rating
  Size
  Height

1
rating Size: M/L

I think these do truly give NO VPL... BUT: rode right into my bottom and gave me a wedgie immediately. I was at the extreme low end of the size I ordered (technically probably should have ordered S/M instead), so don't know if that affected the fit. Didn't feel like they were too big at all overall, just more an issue of cut/design. Also, the crotch is extremely narrow (narrower than a normal panty-liner, so I would not recommend wearing these with a liner), which I think contributed to the wedgie feeling. Perhaps these would work if cut with a more typical width in the crotch and if not cut QUITE so cheeky. I actually like a cheeky cut normally, but these just went straight into the crack once I tried moving in them. Bummer--my search for a totally-no-VPL panty continues. :(

Commando Response: We always value constructive comments and feedback on our styles. We cut many differently shaped bottoms, and there is a reason for that. Not every underwear is made for every body type. A woman with a bigger bottom commonly finds that this style will ride up. The Bikini Panty might be a better fit. Mindy from TN

  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 20s
  • Posted: November, 2015
rating Size: XL

laser cut so absolutely no VPL Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: April, 2014
rating Size: S/M

Nice for "No Lines" with pants and other garments. Silvia from Huntington Beach
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: March, 2014
rating Size: S

comfortable, invisible, barely there feel Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: April, 2013
rating Size: M

I love the cheeky fit, invisible panty lines and lightness of these great all around panties! Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: April, 2013
rating Size: S

minimal panty line, flattering to butt Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Posted: April, 2013
rating Size: S

comfortable, and no panty line, but rolls up when pulling up pants. Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: April, 2013
rating Size: S/M

I was looking for good underwear to work out in with no panty lines. Although there are no seams and I'm sure they are great for no lines, These just didn't fit me right. I could tell they would ride-up too easily. Kris from Tx
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: September, 2012
rating Size: M/L

These are so comfortable and there are never panty lines. Great for when I travel as I can wash them out out at night and they are racy to wear in the morning. Donna from Boca Raton,Florida
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: April, 2012
rating Size: L

they feel very sexy with comfort Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Posted: April, 2012
rating Size: S

Completely seamless and super comfortable! Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Posted: April, 2012
rating Size: XL

I love the material. Fit is a bit off. I tried an M/L and that was a tad small but the L/XL is a little big. I don't think I would buy the Boyshort again but would definitely try another style. Susan from Montpelier/VT/USA
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: March, 2012
rating Size: S/M

Panties too low rides up your rear.

Vendor Response: You purchased our girl short style which is low-rise in front and a "cheeky" fit in the back. If you're wearing the correct size, it should lay flat against the body and not ride up. It's not intended to be a traditional full coverage panty. You may be happier with a commando microfiber bikini or one of our high-rise styles. Marcia from NY

  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 70s
  • Posted: October, 2011
rating Size: S

invisible, super comfortable Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: August, 2011
rating Size: S

Super comfortable, invisible and feels incredible. Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: May, 2011
rating Size: S/M

I really like Commando underwear. It absolutely does not show under clothes and is comfortable to wear. I prefer the CYA Bikini Panty style over the Boyshort Low-Rise, but this style is not carried by Herroom. I am hoping they start to carry this style. Linda from Florida
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 60s
  • Posted: March, 2011
rating Size: S/M

Totally invisible; feels like wearing nothing Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Posted: December, 2010
rating Size: S/M

Was too big arabella from san francisco CA
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 60s
  • Posted: September, 2010
rating Size: S/M

Smooth and seamless. Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: June, 2010
rating Size: S/M

Thin, comfortable, invisible. Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: April, 2010
rating Size: S/M

Nice smooth fit and just the right amount of coverage in back. Wish it came in a true small, though. Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Posted: April, 2010
rating Size: S/M

I love this item! It feels so smooth and doesn't ride up, even during super active sports. Summer from Brooklyn, NY
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 20s
  • Posted: April, 2009
rating Size: M/L

No panty lines and very comfortable Submitted from TheUndies.com
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Posted: March, 2009
rating Size: M/L

there is no line, which is great, and I find them more comfortable than a thong, but still hate that ride up thins susanne from California
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: October, 2008
rating Size: m/l

True to advertised, no panty lines are visible. There is the occasional "ride up" of the panty but nothing to bothersome to make me not wear these. Pricey, but other panties claim no lines and these are the only brand that delivers no lines. Tina from Woodridge
  • Age: 30s
  • Posted: October, 2008
rating Size: S/M

Wow these are great-no vpl at all. Love them Alicia from Highland, MI, USA
  • Posted: May, 2008
rating Size: M/L

love this line!!! g from alexandria/va
  • Posted: March, 2008
rating Size: M/L

The panty was a bandless type which was to show no line, but the top part kept rolling down and not staying up as well as a band at the top would have. I thought they were priced extremely high and quality was extremely poor. I felt I wasted my money on them, and would not consider a 2nd purchase. Sue from Anchorage Ak
  • Posted: November, 2007
rating Size: S/M

These shorts are pretty nice. I like the cheeky look, but they are not as comfortable as a thong to me because there is more material riding up into my behind crack, and sometimes they wedge up pretty far and tight. They are still pretty comfortable, but I like the way the thinner bottom strap of a thong feels going up between my cheeks. Kathy from California
  • Posted: October, 2007
rating Size: S/M

This was, without a doubt, worth the money I paid for them. They are the most comfortable pair of underwear I own and really almost feel like you aren't wearing anything. Jennifer from Chicago, IL, USA
  • Posted: August, 2007
1
close