QT 55517p Lace Panty Reviews
Close

QT Lace Panty 55517p Reviews

Lace Panty
ratingImage Overall Review Rating (13) Write a review
Star Rating:
Size:
Height:

rating Size: 6

These panties run just a little small, or else it's simply the design that makes the leg openings a bit tighter than I'm accustomed to. Because of this, I have VPL when I wear them, so that limits what I can wear them under. They're very pretty, though. I saw a couple of reviews that said they started to fall apart after laundering (I think it was these panties), so I'm being careful to line dry them after washing in cold in a regular wash cycle. So far, so good. Roberta from Gig Harbor, WA, US
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: January, 2014
Size: 5

Gotta admit-I REALLY like these panties! After years of wearing the sexy, but cheap, nylon or satin panties, I rebelled and started wearing boring cotton Jockey-type briefs solely for the comfort, My old "sexy" panties were just too uncomfortable. But I admit, I was missing that sexy feeling...until now. These are comfortable enough for every day AND sexy to boot! Happy me and happy husband! Jules
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 30s
  • Posted: October, 2013
Size: 8

Very sexy and comfortable. Diane from Anaheim Hills, CA
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Age: 60s
  • Posted: August, 2013
rating Size: 7

Much more comfortable than I thought when I originally pulled them out of the bag. Really cute. Could wear these every day. Eileen from Pittsboro, NC, USA
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: October, 2012
rating Size: 6

Fits great looks great abbe from fort lauderdale
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: June, 2012
rating Size: 8

This was really snug for a size 8, I should have gotten a 9. very cute! Ann from Los Angeles, CA
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: May, 2012
rating Size: 8

Very nice, elegant materials. Love the dangle heart charm on the front. They back is full coverage and the front is not high enough to be considered granny panties. Retro sexy. mandyloubelle from Heartland of America
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: January, 2012
rating Size: 6

These panties initially look like there wouldn't be enough butt coverage, but they fit beautifully! I LOVE these! maiupat from Scottsdale, Az USA
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: December, 2011
rating Size: 6

Great fit and comfort. Classy. Steve from Idaho
  • Posted: December, 2011
rating Size: 6

Great fit- nice coverage but still sexy . Doesn't dig into skin and make bulges anywhere abbe from fort lauderdale fl
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: September, 2011
rating Size: 8

The most comfortable bottoms ever! RP from Las Vegas
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: August, 2011
rating Size: 5

Loved these panties. Favorably surprised by more of a V shape in front than the picture shows. Gave them more of a sexy look and feel, which also accented my figure and I think is part of the reason my husband could not take his eyes off of me as I was putting on my makeup the morning I first wore the panties. Kerri from Portland/OR/USA
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: July, 2011
rating Size: 6

Great fit, great price! Ana from Miami
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: March, 2011
close

© 2014 Andra Group, LP - Saturday, December 20, 2014 (A1).