Hanky Panky Signature Lace Retro Thong 9k1926 Reviews

No weird thong lines for us urvy girls but still no panty lines- genius! Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Posted: April, 2013

so comfortable and sexy Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Posted: April, 2013

To the waist, no panty line, blends with flesh tone so it doesn't show through sheer fabrics. Stays in place and doesn't crawl Mrs. D from Tarpley, TX USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50's
• Posted: April, 2013

Perfect! Just perfect. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2013

Beautiful, nice coverage and comfortable. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2013

front coverage, no wedgies! Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2013

Love, love, love the retro look of these undies! Christina from Wilmington, DE

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 30's
• Posted: March, 2013

Pretty,comfortable to wear. If worn with something tight, lines are visible. Full fitting in front,just enough tummy area covered (and I do have a pouch!) Would order again. anne

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 40's
• Posted: March, 2013

Suggested item to go with my bra I ordered but did not match. Although panties are named marshmallow and I've never seen an ivory marshmallow the panties were not white. For my wedding had to return. Dawn from Foothill ranch ca

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 40's
• Posted: February, 2013

Comfortable and no panty line, but not as flattering as others I purchased. But every figure is different so you might like it! If you are concerned about comfort and no panty line, then buy without hesitation. Cam from Indianapolis, IN

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40's
• Posted: October, 2012

Once again the manufactuer needs to get there one size concept to be the same on all styles. I have several of the colors and they are all different.

X Response: We’re so sorry that you’ve experienced inconsistent fit in our retro thongs! We pride ourselves on quality, but sometimes there are production problems. We will check on this. Connie from brunswick

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60's
• Posted: August, 2012

Loved the color, fabric & fit. I only wish it was not one size fits all-- I would like to order a little small so that the lovely, spandex lace could act more supportive and slimming-- I am trying to avoid the girdle word, but you know what I mean !! Sunny from Boston Massachusetts

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40's
• Posted: August, 2012

Soooo sexy. Sharon from New York, New York

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50's
• Posted: August, 2012

Best thong ever!!!!! NY

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 40's
• Posted: July, 2012

Beautiful, flattering, and comfortable. Andrea from Boston

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 40's
• Posted: July, 2012

The most comfy thong - even though lacy - very soft and easy to wear EM from Madison NJ USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50's
• Posted: July, 2012

My only "complaint" is that I'd like to have them a little lower...most other options are way too low. These are just a smidge too high...but better than being too low! Janine from Scottsdale, AZ, USA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50's
• Posted: June, 2012

Wonderful! I love it and now want more! mm from Waterbury Vt

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40's
• Posted: May, 2012

the quality is over the top, they are also so sexy & practical - won't own anything else Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Posted: May, 2012

good coverage comfortable thong Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2012

Covers my ostomy bag Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2012

Looks pretty, holds in stomach & fits beautifully in the behind!!! Beth K. from Flemington, NJ, usa

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50's
• Posted: April, 2012

It covers the tummy area yet has a sexy look, and molds to my body with no panty line. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2012

Sexy for all shapes. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2012

Fits great . My husband loves it. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Posted: April, 2012

Very pretty but not really a "thong". Backside way too wide & panties have too much material overall for me.

Hanky Panky Response: If you would like less coverage, she may prefer the fit of our Signature Lace G-String Style 482051 or Low Rise Thong Style# 4811. Kim

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40's
• Posted: March, 2012

This is quite lovely! It is very easy to wear, very flattering, and fun. I have it in the Marshmallow colour, and it made my man's tongue fall out of his head. :-) Bianca from New York

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 30's
• Posted: March, 2012

I tried these and also the regular original rise thongs. I prefer the original ones over these which surprises me because I generally like my panties to come higher up-closer to my belly button. I do like that there seems to be more tummy support and no panty lines, but these just aren't as comfortable as the original rise thongs. Wanda from Jerome, ID, USA

• Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 50's
• Posted: March, 2012

New favorite!!! I want more! Very flattering and comfortable. Love! Caroline from Los Angeles, CA

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40's
• Posted: March, 2012

Can't wear any other thong as they are all cut so low over the belly. This is just right for those of us who need a little control and coverage in that area while still being super sexy.......and comfortable. Kate from NYC

• Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50's
• Posted: February, 2012