Softest lace I've ever worn. Kathlene from Nevada

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: March, 2012

So soft, comfortable and sexy… maybe the best underwear I have ever owned. DS from New York, NY

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: October, 2011

Very comfortable and lace is nice. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2011

SJ from Queens got it just right: they're big, and they're big! I'm 5'8" and 200lbs. I wear a size 16 or 18 bottom, and size 9 underwear. I got the 1X of these, and they're big. Not falling off, but they'll slide around under jeans. And they're definitely full coverage. They don't look sexy. But they're comfortable! Kristen from Nutley, NJ

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: March, 2011

I'm a Hanky Panky convert! These boyshorts are the most comfortable, best-fitting panties I've ever worn. The lace is so light, you'll forget you're wearing underwear. No binding or cutting means no panty-lines (I'm not a thong-fan, so these are perfect for eliminating the panty-line problem!) Nikki from Bethesda, MD

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: February, 2011

Runs large; I would buy one size smaller. Comfortable but too much material. Felt like a full brief. SJ from Queens, NY

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: January, 2011

Went a size larger in this and it was perfect fitting. Is sexy and looks awesome with the cami. A winning purchase worth the price! ChicagoGal from Chicago

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: November, 2010

Very comfortable, sexy but not "bloomers" for larger size Amy from Monroe, Michigan, USA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: October, 2010