comfort,sexy as hell Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2013

Normally I would take a large but I ordered the XL because I wished to cover my bottom more fully. I purchased the lace since under a slack a smooth line can still be achieved without wearing a thong. This was accomplished without the XL looking baggy. I do wish, though, that the lace would be a finer quality; soft instead of stiff. It is wearable, though I would not order again & look for briefs/panties that are of a finer quality.

Grenier Response: I do agree that a boyleg cut is a good alternative to thongs under pants. While panty #548 is made of a “corded” lace which might not show under heavy fabric, a better choice would be Grenier Elegance Boy Leg Panty 586, also a boyleg cut but in a light satiny fabric which would be more appropriate in color nude under pants made of a finer fabric. Carmela from Chappaqua, NY 10514

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: December, 2012

Being an avid wearer of thongs thanks to my husband, I have decided to go for the big Knicker look so I bought these to try. A little expensive but they fit so well and are so comfortable that I ordered 2 more pairs. I have also ordered Rago high waisted girdle. I am hooked on the control brief! My husband also admits I still look sexy so it is a win win all around. Thank you. sophie from london

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: June, 2012

love it Barbara from Jackson, CA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "No Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: January, 2012

Lovely panties! High waist yet sexy. Too bad they are so expensive or I'd buy a bunch more. Alison from Paris, France

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: August, 2011