Flexees 3017 Fat Free Dressing Boy Short Reviews
Be the first to know
 
Close

Flexees Fat Free Dressing Boy Short 3017 Reviews

Fat Free Dressing Boy Short
ratingImage Overall Review Rating (65) Write a review
Star Rating:
Size:
Height:

1 3
rating Size: S

Review from Hollywood stylist, Phillip Bloch "I love this Fat-Free Dressing Boy Short to keep your bum firm and covered and your tummy tucked in this season's must-have minis (skirts)." Phillip Bloch from Hollywood

  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: October, 2009
rating Size: M

I agree with the other reviewer, the legs rolled up. I took note of the fact that the HerRoom suggested a larger size, but with the medium, I didn't get the feeling that there was any tummy control at all. Basically, it wasn't doing anything. This is designed for apple shaped women who have skinny legs. Allison
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: May, 2009
rating Size: XL

The tummy control is not firm enough and the legs were way to short...I'm tall and they did not fit like shorts. I wouldn't purchase them again. Gail from Rochester NY
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: May, 2009
rating Size: L

The boy short legs curled right up on me every time I sat. There is no special material to help grib as others I've tried, so it was quite disappointing to have to throw away since I wore them once, but it is what it is.

HerRoom Response: When a leg creeps up, it's usually a sign that the garment is a size too small for you. Pamela from Chicago, Illinois, USA

  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: May, 2009
rating Size: L

They rolled and did not feel comfortable. Would not purchase them again.

HerRoom Response: Rolling is a sign that you probably bought a size too small. We suggest you purchase the next size up. eliz from santilli

  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: April, 2009
1 3
close

© 2014 Andra Group, LP - Monday, July 28, 2014 (A1).