Fantasie fs5129 Orlando Adjustable Swim Leg Short Reviews
Close

Fantasie Orlando Adjustable Swim Leg Short fs5129 Reviews

Orlando Adjustable Swim Leg Short
ratingImage Overall Review Rating (11) Write a review
Star Rating:
Size:
Height:

rating Size: XL

great fit! i love the adjustable sides so i can be my modest self. very flattering. Marla from Seattle, WA
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 30s
  • Posted: December, 2012
rating Size: S

Item was made well but loose around legs in the back. This may be due to my lack of derriere but I would prefer it to fit more snugly in that area.

Fantasie Response: Perhaps the Fantasie Orlando Classic Brief Swim Bottom FS5127 with less coverage would be more flattering. Or you might find that our Freya brand is more your style. Generally speaking Freya briefs are more pared down than the Fantasie briefs, and they’re also offered in XS which might be what you really need. Andrea from tx

  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: July, 2012
rating Size: XXL

These bottoms are perfect - not too revealing but still sexy. I really like how the sides tie. They're also true to size and of good quality. I highly recommend . Dlynne from Olney, MD
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Age: 30s
  • Posted: April, 2012
rating Size: L

Very nice. Great fabric and great fit. I wear a 10 in pants and the large was just right. I am tall and this bottom with the tankini is perfect as far as coverage of my bum and tummy without looking frumpy. Shannon from Salt Lake City, UT 84106
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: March, 2012
rating Size: L

Great coverage for those of us "real"woman. Prompt delivery. My only complaint is the elastic in the leg opening feels loose which is better than too tight but I am afraid I will have to send back. I feel like they might really ride up when wet or over time. Mahrannie from Kirkland, ea
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: November, 2011
rating Size: S

Not enough coverage

Fantasie Response: Sorry it did not work for you. Maybe try a medium bottom. Sometimes the suit bottoms run small. Michaelle from Seattle, WA

  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 50s
  • Posted: August, 2011
rating Size: L

I was in between sizes. I fit a L on the hip measurements and an XL on the waist measurements so it was hard to choose a size. I went with the L and it works but it is a little tight and because of this the waist rolls down a little bit. Luckily the top covers it so this is not really a problem. If it wasn't for that I would give them a 5. I have a feeling if I had chosen the XL they would have been a tad too big. Comfortable fabric and great coverage. Overall pleased. Melissa from Houston, TX
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 20s
  • Posted: August, 2011
rating Size: M

I ordered sizes small and medium because I was not sure how the item would fit. I am keeping the small. I am 5'5" and weigh 112lbs. The negative about the bottoms is that the leg openings are very loose, even when the ties are tightened. On the plus side, the material is substantial so there is no fear of see through. Ann from Saratoga,CA, USA
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 40s
  • Posted: July, 2011
rating Size: M

Love the fit and coverage! Cindy from Kansas
  • Height: Petite (5'3" and under)
  • Age: 30s
  • Posted: July, 2011
rating Size: XL

Excellent service good fit. Thank You, Nancy Nancy from Greenacres, FL, Palm Beach
  • Height: Tall (5'9" and over)
  • Age: 60s
  • Posted: May, 2011
rating Size: L

BEAR IN MIND, I AM NO SPRING CHICK. BUT I DO SWIM! THE SWIM SEPARATES ARE COMFORTABLE, DO NOT CREEP UP, AND ARE NOT CUT UP TOO HIGH. ADJUSTABLE BOTTOM IS A GOD SEND. sheila from smyrna
  • Height: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
  • Age: 70s
  • Posted: June, 2010
close

© 2014 Andra Group, LP - Thursday, November 20, 2014 (A1).