I like the support in this panty. Helps to hold in the lower stomach. Just enough support. Lia from New York, NY

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: May, 2012

I ordered these because I seem to be allergic to Latex. I have washed them many times and they seem to be getting smaller and smaller. I do not put them in the dryer. I do not wash them in hot water. I just ordered 2 more pairs in a larger size. I wish that the larger size came in white. There is a seam that is opening at the crotch. Mary Ann from McNaull

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 70's
• Posted: December, 2011

Love the pink color BUT they are sized smaller than the whites! Order a size larger if you don't want to be pulling them down.

Elita response: 8862, The only difference in the 8862 fashion color is that the leg on it is shorter, making it a little more sexy. Susan from New York City

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: September, 2010

These are very comfortable and non-binding around the leg openings, which is what I was looking for. They don't stay smoothly around my thighs, but maybe that was asking too much. I wear them with loose-fitting jeans, so it's okay. Lois from Cranston, RI

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: June, 2010

I like these. Joyce from Woodland, CA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 70's
• Posted: April, 2010

Great fit. Light and comfortable. Can hardly feel them on. Pedal Diva from Sacramento, CA

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: April, 2010

the best underwear on the market - too bad I can't find them in local shops angela from florida

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 70's
• Posted: August, 2009

I love the fit of these. It's so hard to find the higher waisted boy shorts. The center seam is soft and not irritating. I do find the crotch construction a bit bulky, but I've gotten used to it, and prefer it over several other options I've tried on other brands. I wash these on delicate/hand wash in my washing machine, in lingerie bags and hang them to dry and I've had no wear/tear issues, even after 2 years. My only negative is that they do not come in a cotton version in the XL size. While the fabric of these feels great and slides nicely under certain types of clothes, I find that they don't breathe enough for outdoor activity or hot/humid weather. Ruth from Oregon

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: June, 2009

Love the materiel !Very comfortable...I'd like to see them with a six inch rise and a wider waist(square cut), but,I'd still buy them again! M.S. from Buffalo,NY USA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: June, 2009

Feels like you aren't wearing anything. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over), "Low Bottom"
• Posted: March, 2009

I love the material and feel but I hate the extra lining in the crouch area as it rolls and is very uncomfortable. Also I was looking for underwear that would not ride up under jeans. These still ride up. Although I'm in my 60s, 5'9" and 135lbs, I still like my "skinny" jeans and hate my underwear riding up or pantie lines.

HerRoom Response: It sounds like you should be trying a medium instead of a large. Ride up usually means the panty is too large. Sonia from Columbia Mo USA

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: January, 2009

VERY comfortable. I use them for the gym right now because they don't ride up or show a panty line and are lightweight. They come up high on my waist but I am tall so it is not a problem. I will order more. I have not had them long enough to know about wear and tear issues; hence, I have rated them with 4 stars instead of 5. Mimi from Tallahassee, FL

• Body Type: , "Low Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: August, 2008