My height is 5'2" and my waist is 34" to 35." These panties are so comfortable I can't even feel them. They are so thin they are great to wear under pants but they are opaque too. They are wonderful to wear under nightgowns to keep my thighs from rubbing together. My belly sticks out but they go right over it up to my real waist. My legs are not very fat. I am 58, so my figure has changed from fat legs and butt and flat belly to thinner legs and butt and fat belly, so the bottoms of the panty legs do not hug up to my legs, but are loose, like men's swim trunks or something. Anyway, they work really well for me. I am very happy with them. Lorna

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: May, 2012

will work for the purpose i need. karen

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: May, 2012

Very comfortable panties, I use them under my riding breeches to prevent chafing. I've tried many items and these are the best! And no panty line is a bonus. Linda from Pleasant Hill, California

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: May, 2012

I'm usually a size 16 on the bottom. The L is actually a little too large. Doesn't fall down, but is not as snug as I'd like. Hope it shrinks a bit. Very comfortable! Works great under skirts. Probably will buy again. Shootnshop from San Antonio, Tx

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: April, 2012

I wanted these to wear under some tighter fitting Kamala pants and not have them ride up my bottom as with thongs. They worked well but a little big. Wish they came in XS and black. Very comfy!! Laura from Marietta, GA USA

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: April, 2012

The BEST! So comfortable and no lines. Perfect for summer skirts. I love the long leg as it does not ride up or show lines. I bought 7 pairs. I wish the manufacturer would offer these in nude and black. I bought the boyshort version in this as well. I kept one of the boyshorts and returned the remaining as they ride up and are not as comfy as the long. Gayle from Colorado

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: April, 2012

These look and feel perfect--no hideous panty lines at all. These give fuller coverage than "granny panties," yet have none of the ugliness of those unfortunate things. These also serve as the perfect anti-chafing, modesty-ensuring short pants under dresses and skirts Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2012

I'm in love. Bought these to wear under a pair of new, unlined pants that are just a bit too thin for modesty. I didn't want hose underneath, because that would be too warm for summer. These fit the bill perfectly. The cotton is luxuriously soft and feels just a wee bit decadent. Negatives: the waist band is slightly higher than I usually wear even for briefs, and I'd probably be better off in a size smaller. But these are trivial things, and really, better higher and bigger than too low and too tight, right? Anyway, I'm ordering another pair and getting the shorter version as well to wear under summer skirts. Chris from PA

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: March, 2012

The most comfortable panty I have every worn. No riding up. The cotton is very high quality. Very soft, very breathable Thin enough not to be bulky. Pants glide over them. They feel wonderful under skirts I wish they offered these in black and so I dyed a couple pair black and now I have two white and two black pairs. They are modest but sexy and very practical. Most importantly, they protect and defend! I will be adding more of these underwear to my under garment wardrobe Kelly from Helena, MT

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: March, 2012

Product met my expections. Reviews were very helpful in selecting size. Very comfortable; plan to order more. Patricia from IA

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 60's
• Posted: January, 2012

I bought these to wear under knit pants to avoid panty lines and give a smooth look. I tried various panties, which left panty line, and some synthetic bicycle short type shapewear, but didn't like the little bulge created in my thigh at the bottom hem. I also prefer the feel of wearing cotton against my skin. These are wide enough at the bottom that no dent or little bulge is created in the thigh. Not perfect for this shapewear use, but works pretty well. Comfortable. Nice quality cotton. Leslie from Texas

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: November, 2011

I'm blessed with big ol' thighs (thanks, genetics!) and I hate the sensation of my thighs rubbing together when I'm wearing dresses and skirts. These Calida long legs solve the problem like nothing else -- and I've tried a LOT of other styles. I'm not looking for a control garment -- something made out of thick, stretchy, synthetic fabric. And I don't want a split slip made out of flimsy, icky nylon. And I don't want those weird petti-pant things with all the dainty lace and silk. I just want something form-fitting, well-made, not too stupid-looking, and COTTON. If you're looking for something similar, take my advice and buy these. You might find something that costs less, but you won't find anything better. They're expensive, but niche products always are, and since I only need one or two pairs, I'm happy to pay the price to have the perfect solution to my thigh-rubbing problem. Judy from Los Angeles, California

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: August, 2011