good coverage for the plus size ladies Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Posted: May, 2013

Comfortable, invisible under clothing, does what it is supposed to do. MK

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 50's
• Posted: July, 2012

The product looked well made and good quality but I returned it for a refund as soon as I opened it. I would not have gotten one leg in the waist let alone get it pulled up and around my self. Barbara from Sun City, AZ

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 70's
• Posted: June, 2012

I like these panties so much that I've ordered them more than once. They're lightweight, just the right length and have no uncomfortable stays which dig in. Ruth from Wausaukee, WI, USA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60's
• Posted: August, 2011

I'd had these before & loved them. I've lost a lot of weight and have extra sags, but these smooth everything out. I like that they are above the waist, as it makes such a smooth line. Louise from Portland, OR USA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60's
• Posted: July, 2011

perfect fit and no line noticeable. Good for pants and shorts sandi from marietta, ga, usa

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60's
• Posted: June, 2011

The butt "cut outs" on these were not large enough and cut into the round portion of my buttocks. Might not be the best choice for women with large bottoms and small waists. The assets by Sarah Blakely fit better. Rachael from PA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 30's
• Posted: January, 2011

Many reviewers on this site seemed to like these. I felt that for the added bulk of the "firm control" fabric, they didn't offer more shaping than a more comfortable lighter control version of the garment. oneshopper from Greenfield, MA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40's
• Posted: June, 2010

holds me without binding Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Tall (5'9" and over)
• Posted: April, 2010

Love this brand. I am between sizes, ordered L instead of M. I find these really comfortable. They don't roll at the waist, and the leg bottoms stay put nicely. Beachnut from Westlake, OR

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 60's
• Posted: October, 2009

I was delighted to find the Body Wrap Long Leg Panty. I purchased one several years ago and loved it. I have been looking for a new one, but I couldn't find one. Spanx and other products just do not fit as well and have the support that the Body Wrap does. It's comfortable, doesn't ride up, and helps shape so very well. I am happy to have found the Body Wrap again! Mary from Chattanooga, TN

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under)
• Age: 60's
• Posted: August, 2009

These are the best bike-short style support panties made! I recently went looking for them in stores and tried on dozens of alternatives; none fit as well as these, so I ordered them online. Unlike Spanx and all the others, they aren't too loose at my waist (I'm hour-glass shaped) and the legs are long enough to make it to my knees. In the summer (it gets very hot and humid here), I wear these under every skirt I own to prevent chafing thighs (nylons are too hot). I picked one size smaller than the chart says I should wear, using my waist size as the determining factor. That works best for my shape. These are especially good for women whose hips and waists are very different measurements (hour-glass). Melyssa from Wisconsin

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8")
• Age: 40's
• Posted: June, 2009