Sexy and comfortable with no panty lines! Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2013

Best panty ever. Feels like you have nothing on. Breathable, sexy, comfortable. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2013

Soooooo sheer and comfy Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2013

lightweight, comfortable, does not move under clothing. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2013

Very comfortable. Sexy undies that you can wear every day. No riding up or falling down. This is my third order of these OnGossamer undies. I love them. Sara from San Francisco CA USA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: September, 2012

Very comfortable even in warm weather. Very cute too! This is my second purchase of these panties and I'm amazed how well they've withstood being run through the washer and dryer. Sunny from San Francisco CA

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: August, 2012

Perfect for everyday... Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2012

Just wanted to amend my earlier review. Now that I ordered more of these 3202's in black this time, I realize that the 3202's don't have more cheek coverage than the 3206s. It's just that the lighter colors (like champagne) run bigger than the darker ones. The black ones of these 3202 are much higher up on the rear for me. I held them up and compared to my champagned colored ones and the black appear to be a full size smaller. I'm guessing the black will work in Medium but am sending back for an exchange to find out. Shelley from Fort Myers, FL

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: January, 2012

THE BEST! After being frustrated by all of the options I could find in retail stores (didn't like ANY), I decided to try this website. I ordered 10 different options in hopes of finding one that I might like. I guess I have to admit, I am that picky. These are the best option and actually better than I could have hoped. The mesh is so fine and soft. I read reviews that many ordered mesh at the request of the husband, but I actually like these for the way they wear under clothes. They have no bulk and are comfy even under tight garments. And they are invisible under clothes--a dream! Full cheek coverage in the back but not at all granny panties. The low rise is just right--not too low. They never ride up. You can forget that you are wearing them. Honestly, these couldn't be better. If you are someone who would prefer just a little less cheek coverage, the other On Gossamer style (3206) sits a little higher on the rear but still doesn't ride up. Shelley from Fort Myers, FL

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: December, 2011

Love Love Love the Gossamer bikinis. It's like not wearing anything at all. Thin and natural. No ride up, but you are covered. Joyce from Crofton MD

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "No Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: October, 2011

Love the mesh materials. However, the seam came off quickly and I wash all my panties by hand. For the price, it should be more durable. I'm not going to order it again.

HerRoom Response: We appreciate your feedback. You left this exact same comment on 3 different styles. We're thinking your washing technique could be the issue.

OnGossamer Response: We are sorry this product didn’t work out for you. The care instructions say hand wash in cold water. Even when washed in the machine with cold water our product holds up pretty good. Alex from DC

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: July, 2011

very happy with all items-will order more Linda from Frisco TX

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: February, 2011