Hip Fit Cotton Boyshort Panties Customer Reviews

These fit beautifully, don't ride up, offer the benefits of cotton (absorbency) and, by their cut and trim, are also sexy and attractive. I'll save the total lace ones for special occasions...I think I've found my every day, under everything panties. They launder well, too... Pamela, Miami, FL, Age: 60's March, 2010, Tall (5'9" and over), "Average Bottom" Size: 6

They are very pretty and fit well. They only issue I have is that there are so many seams in the crotch. I found them kind of irritating over time. suzzanne, Washington, DC, Age: 30's February, 2010, Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom" Size: 6

I bought these in black. They're adorably feminine and I haven't had a problem with them riding up. They are not the best boyshorts, but they are certainly worth the buy. They do have a negative cut in the back, so they'll either accentuate fab or flab to me- depending on what you have. Jen, California, Age: 20's February, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: 5

I bought these to wear under my rehearsal dinner dress, the fit was perfect! Amanda, Pomeroy, Ia, Age: 20's February, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom" Size: 8

I've been wearing this model of panties for years -- I love them. My bottom is between "no bottom" and "average" -- sort of a boy butt. In my experience, other boy shorts can fit too snugly around the thighs and you get a panty line, but these are a bit looser around the leg so they don't leave a mark. The trade-off is that after a few months, the elastic at the leg does loosen up even further (even though I wash them in cold water and line dry them), which isn't a problem under tight pants that hold the panties in place, but under skirts the panties will ride up a bit. Still, they're my favorite. Reba, Chicago, IL, Age: 40's February, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: 8

Love 'em Rhea, Redondo Beach, CA, Age: 60's February, 2010, Petite (5'3" and under), "No Bottom" Size: 7

Absolutely great fit and extremely comfortable, especially the trim around the leg openings! A super pantie! jenny, Seoul/Korea, Age: 40's January, 2010, Tall (5'9" and over), "Low Bottom" Size: M

Love this item, best panties I've owned.. June, Bridgewater Ma. USA, Age: 60's January, 2010, Petite (5'3" and under), "Low Bottom" Size: 7

Great fit & very flattering Panty Princess, NYC, Age: 40's January, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: L

These fit well in the back, but are a little high in the front. Very comfy. Beware - the black color bleeds in the wash. Angie, Southern California, Age: 40's November, 2009, Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom" Size: 5

Very comfy - wash great, don't shrink.... Sue, Akron, Age: 40's October, 2009, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom" Size: L

Love the fit better than the Victoria one's I purchased. I'm sure this will be my undies of choice for a long time. June, Bridgewater Ma. 02324, Age: 60's August, 2009, Petite (5'3" and under) Size: 7