feminine and girly. I like the thicker sides Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Posted: April, 2013

This is a very pretty panty. I like the fuller coverage, wider front. Tabatha

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 30's
• Posted: January, 2012

The large was true to size and as expected. If I desire to have the thong fall higher to my waist, I would have chosen the x-large. For some items of clothing I like undergarments sitting higher to my waist. Having a fuller front, I would always prefer thongs to be a bit wider from the crotch towards the front panel. A 1/4" to 1/2" would be good no matter how small someone is. I really like Elle Macpherson undergarments; I feel sexy. They are also functional and can be wore daily. My 21 year old daughter is also a big fan. "C" from Westchester, NY

• Body Type: Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Full Thigh & Bottom"
• Age: 50's
• Posted: April, 2010

Did not care for the fuller cut sides at all. The back is definitely not compatible with low rise pants. The fit, again, is very large and actually bagged on me. Kathy from Beavercreek, OH USA

• Body Type: Petite (5'3" and under), "No Bottom"
• Age: 40's
• Posted: May, 2009

Extremely well-made. I like the wide sides. Somewhat narrow fit. Lillie from New York, NY

• Body Type: , "Average Bottom"
• Age: 20's
• Posted: August, 2008

Beautiful details and I like the moderately wide sides. Submitted from TheUndies.com

• Body Type: , "Average Bottom"
• Posted: July, 2008

Slightly narrow fitting CM from New Zealand

• Posted: February, 2007