Flawless Fit Boyshort Brief Panties Customer Reviews

Love the fit and no seams or hems means no panty lines.They stay in place and the legs do not roll up. Love the comfort. RuthE, Georgetown, Age: 60's December, 2011, Petite (5'3" and under), "Full Thigh & Bottom" Size: 6

I should have known from the picture that these would be low riders and sized towards the junior buyer. I've got a gut and my waist is bigger than my hips (I know..it IS super sexy-don't be too jealous). I have a hard time with any clothes. I have been trying new styles of underpants. These don't work so well for me. Not comfortable. They roll up on the thigh and down on the waist. Like everything in life-not so much a good match for this lady-maybe better for you! Sheila, Phoenix, AZ, Age: 40's November, 2011, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: 7

very comfortable, love it Windy, Norway, Age: 40's September, 2011, Petite (5'3" and under), "Average Bottom" Size: 6

I absolutely LOVE these! I've been looking for panties that don't have tight elastic at the legs, so I bought a bunch of different styles to try. I'm now coming back to order a lot more of this one! They stay put without binding or cutting into me anywhere. They adequately cover my butt, don't ride up in the crack. Basically, I just put them on and never even think about my panties for the rest of the day, because there are no annoyances to draw my attention or need adjustment. CalliopeJane, New Orleans, LA, Age: 40's September, 2011, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: 7

these looked laughingly small when i pulled them out of the package, but they have a LOT of stretch! the rise is low enough that when i wear these for any length of time, the top rolls down. very uncomfortable. puddleunicorn, st. louis, MO, Age: 20's September, 2011, Petite (5'3" and under), "Full Thigh & Bottom" Size: 8

Excellent fit, adequate coverage but it feels weightless. Very comfortable. Mel, Japan, Age: 50's August, 2011, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: 6

They fit very nice. Thank you! Missy, MB/SC, Age: 50's August, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom" Size: 5

These come way further up on my stomach than they do on the model in the photo! They come to right under my belly button. I'm somewhat short waisted, but the difference from the photo is quite extreme. Still, these are some of the only boyshort panties that actually cover everything for me, so I'll be purchasing more of them. ACD, Cambridge, MA, Age: 30's July, 2010, Petite (5'3" and under), "Full Thigh & Bottom" Size: 7

These panties live up to their description of being "Flawless". I am a repeat customer. And, will continue to purchase BT 2855 as long as they exist. Rockie, Harrisburg, Arkansas, Age: 40's May, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: 8

I was very disappointed with these briefs--the fit was not flawless! The briefs rode up and stayed up, and the result was very uncomfortable. The legs of the boy short barely covered my bottom. I think the legs of the boy short should have been longer. I am petite, with a small round bottom, and I normally wear size 5 underwear. Perhaps they fit better for people with no curves, however, if you have any curves at all, these may not work for you!

Barely There Response: We are sorry you are not satisfied with your purchase and hope you can find another Barely There style to suit your needs. Pat, DC Metropolitan Area, United States, Age: 40's May, 2010, Petite (5'3" and under), "Bubble Bottom" Size: 5

These are perfect for lifting just a bit and showing absolutely NO panty line. Perfect. Kathleen, Huson/Mt/USA, Age: 50's May, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Low Bottom" Size: 5

Very inexpensive. Fits well and lies smoothly under clothing. TheUndies.com, April, 2010, Average Height (5'4"-5'8"), "Average Bottom" Size: S